Skip to main content

Alien 3 (1992) - David Fincher

ALIEN³ is a sci-fi horror film from visionary director David Fincher. It was released on May 22nd, 1992 by 20th Century Fox to lukewarm reviews. No doubt this movie has a different feel than the previous entries. It’s far more bleak and depressing. The setting is different but the formula remains the same. Alien 3 marks another return to the franchise by actress Sigourney Weaver, returning to her role of the bad-ass, Ellen Ripley. Other actors include Charles Dance, Brian Glover, Charles S. Dutton, Paul McGann, Lance Henriksen and Holt McCallany.

Following the events of the first two films, Alien and Aliens. Lieutenant Ellen Ripley, Corporal Hicks, Newt and synthetic human Bishop are jettisoned from the Sulaco in an escape pod after a fire threatens the ship. The group are in stasis when they crash land on maximum security prison planet, Fiorina 161. Otherwise known as Fury 161. Unfortunately and controversially, Ripley is the sole survivor of the crash. Killing off the fan favorites and setting a dark tone for the remainder of the movie. The prisoners here on Fury are all male and have mostly all sworn to abide by a life of celibacy. Needless to say they don’t take to kindly to this woman that fell from the sky. Not to mention the horror that she brought with her in that escape pod.

Alien 3 was plagued from issues right from the start. It didn’t have a finalized script for a good portion of the production time. This caused a lot of frustration and confusion all leading to the original director, Vincent Ward, being replaced by newcomer, David Fincher. Fincher had been known for music-videos and short-films at this time. So, this movie would be a huge step in his career. However, the studio couldn’t keep out of meddling in the project. A huge sign that the producers didn’t have any confidence in this newfound director. Ultimately, this is why the movie has such a bad reputation. It’s also the reason why David Fincher had denounced the picture. The movie’s poor performance at the box office sure didn’t help things.

Growing up, I had seen this movie dozens of times on cable television. I remember watching it frequently, but being disappointed quite a bit. It bothered me that Hicks and Newt had to die. This is a big issue that this movie had suffered and continues to suffer from on review websites and from critics. It kills all momentum that the franchise had going forward and almost certainly killed the franchise altogether. You also don’t get much on-screen time with the Xenomorph. That always bugged me.

There are some really cool elements that this movie introduces. The setting is cool. Fiorina 161 is a cool concept, and I appreciate the effort in expanding the already interesting Ridley Scott Universe. I also really liked the prisoners. Sometimes it felt weird that so many inmates were from England, but after a bit - it felt natural. The Xenomorph in this one is one of my favorites. A Xenomorph/Dog Hybrid is badass, the few times you get to see it. I didn’t like the CGI parts. Most of the time is looked unnatural and off putting. But the practical effects were really well made.

Alien 3 is the worst of the original Quadrilogy. While I really like the idea of expanding the Scott Universe, the poor decisions and studio meddling hurt the movie and left a bunch of gaping holes. I really wish this feature turned out better than it had. It has entertaining scenes and a cool concept, but it was executed poorly and couldn’t maintain the quality that the first two movies had done. I suggest watching this along with the other movies Alien, Aliens and Alien: Resurrection.

Directed: David Fincher
Produced: Gordon Carroll, David Giler and Walter Hill
Screenplay: David Giler, Walter Hill and Larry Ferguson
Story: Vincent Ward
Starring: Sigourney Weaver, Charles S. Dutton, Charles Dance, Paul McGann, Brian Glover, Ralph Brown, Danny Webb, Christopher John Fields, Holt McCallany and Lance Henriksen
Music: Elliot Goldenthal
Cinematography: Alex Thomson
Editor: Terry Rawlings
Production Company: Brandywine Productions
Distributed: 20th Century Fox
Release date: May 22, 1992
Running time: 114 minutes (Theatrical Cut)
145 minutes (Assembly Cut)
Country United States
Language English
Budget $50–55 million
Box office $159.8 million


Popular posts from this blog

Inseminoid (1981) - Norman J. Warren

What can be said for mindless schlock pictures like this one. They were pumped out in droves during the eighties. Inseminoid!? give me a break! It sounds like some pre-pubescent teenage boys came up with the title. On the plus side the movie isn't horrible to look at and it has a decent amount of gore. If you can separate yourself from the political incorrectness, then you might have a perfectly decent Sci-Fi Monster Feature. 

A research team exploring caves on Jupiter accidentally awakens an ancient alien that rapes and impregnates one of the team members. She suffers from terrible shock and trauma, leading to a complete mental breakdown as her pregnancy accelerates faster and faster. Feeling threatened she decides to kill anyone she deems a threat. Can the rest of the research team survive or will they all become victims of INSEMINOID!
Apparently this movie had a million dollar budget. That's really shocking considering the outcome of the picture. The acting isn't phenomen…

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy.

Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural tast…

The Stand (1994) - Mark Garris

The Stand is a phenomenal Stephen King novel that was adapted into a pretty decent TV movie of the same title. It was released in 1994 and boasted a huge cast of stars and cameos. I had always been hesitant to see this film since it was a made-for-television picture. However, after watching Stephen King’s IT my hang-ups were put to rest. What I discovered is a movie that is charming, thought provoking and a bit unnerving. While it isn’t without it’s own issues. The Stand turned out to be a pretty great picture. 

A super-virus is released on the world that wipes out millions of people. This horrific act summons the demonic Randall Flagg to kick start the Apocalypse. However, there are a large number of those that were immune that are not going to let the world burn. They form a resistance and vow to take a stand against the evil forces of Flagg. 

The narrative interweaves the individual stories of a lot of different characters. The most impressive part of this flick is the huge cast. Ga…