Skip to main content

Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Myers (1988) - Dwight H. Little


Halloween III was a social failure. Sure, today it is looked back on as a Cult Classic. It's the one entry to the Halloween series that strays far from the Michael Myers motif. But, when it came out Moustapha Akkad had different plans for the series. He wanted it to be like a sort of anthology series. A different antagonist for each picture. This didn't happen. Fans wanted Michael Myers to return and that is just what happened. Disagreements with John Carpenter would unfortunately lead to his departure from the films, thus making Halloween 4 the first in the series to not have anything to do with Carpenter. Kind of a shame really. 

Last we saw Michael Myers before this point would be back in Halloween II. Laurie Strode and Dr. Loomis had seemingly made it away from the monster when they exploded a hospital on him. But that didn't kill him. Myers survived and ended up being detained in a coma at a very high security medical prison. He escapes during a mis-handled prisoner transfer in search for his niece, Jamie Lloyd in Haddonfield. Dr. Loomis returns to help in the fight against this psychopath. 

It's a pretty standard, late-eighties slasher movie. The promiscuous teenagers paying the ultimate price and dying off one by one during the night. Michael Myers is painted as a brutal and indestructible force. He actually resembles Jason Voorhees of the Friday the 13th franchise more than the usual Michael Myers that we have all come to fear. The Shape. That may be a downside for most folks. But for me, this only leads to some really creative deaths.

The effects are good. John Carl Buechler, the director of Friday the 13th actually came in and did a few things for the movie too. He provided some really gruesome scenes including one where a persons head gets ripped off of their body as they are driving. The only thing that bothered me is Michael's ability to teleport. He did it way too much. I know he doesn't actually teleport in the film. That isn't a power or anything. It's just an example of poor planning from the director. Nothing too horrible though. It doesn't become unwatchable. Everything else checks out. Nothing is too amazing and nothing drags it down.



This may be the best of the Halloween sequels. It is definitely one of the most brutal, with only the Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers Directors Cut, surpassing it. This movie is not okay for kids to watch. They will have nightmares. It's pretty vicious. So far, Halloween 4 has been one of my favorites. I like the Jamie Lloyd character and I am always a fan of Michael's. Check it out. 

Director: Dwight H. Little
Producer: Paul Freeman[1]
Writers: Alan B. McElroy, Danny Lipsius, Larry Rattner and Benjamin Ruffner
Starring: Donald Pleasence, Ellie Cornell, Danielle Harris and Michael Pataki
Studio: Trancas International and 20th Century Fox
Release Date: October 21, 1988
Country: United States
Did ya know: Series creator John Carpenter wrote a treatment for this film that had a more ghostly psychological approach to the Michael Myers mythos. It concerned the town of Haddonfield and what effect the events of the first two films had on its citizens. This concept was later rejected by the producers in favor of the typical slasher fare, at which point Carpenter bailed out of the film, making this the first in the series to have no participation from him.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy. Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural t...

Le Diable au Convent (1899) - George Melies

Le Diable au Convent is longer than the two previous Georges Méliès ventures into short form horror. This particular French short shows the Devil himself running a convent and terrorizing the poor old nuns that live there. However he is finally vanquished by the good of Faith. This is yet another Méliès classic, showcasing the art work that really goes into his short film-making. This is one of the earliest examples of a horror movie that could rely on its elaborate set design and artistic design. Everything in this film, although horribly aged, has been packaged extremely well. If you are a fan of production and set design then I would highly recommend just about anything that Melies has his name on. Though nothing that is considered too extreme actually happens, Satan does have his way with a convent. The satanic imagery itself must have kept this film on the traveling carnival circuit. It certainly wouldn’t fit into the good moral bag that society shoved i...

Spookies (1986) - Genie Joseph, Thomas Doran, and Brendan Faulkner

It's impossible to get a decent movie when you take two films and just squash them together. That is essentially the story of how this movie came together. The film started as Twisted Souls. However, according to the financial backer they didn't have enough horror. So they ended up hiring another guy to come in and add a monster in virtually every scene.  This movie started out being directed by Brendan Faulkner and Thomas Doran. It basically is the tale of two sets of teenagers that arrive to a strange building surrounded by a strange cemetery. It was your usual tale of teenagers in a big hows with a few monsters. Then they brought in Genie Joseph and added even more. Like a haunted birthday party, a murderous cat-man, zombies, and an old wizard. It really became a smorgasbord of horror with a very thin plot-line leading it around. This movie is hard to summarize in a conventional way. It just packs so much.  The most interesting part of this movie are ...