Skip to main content

Body Parts (1991) - Eric Red


Body Parts is really interesting. It takes the story of The Hands of Orlac and tries to make it more believable. In some ways it succeeds and in a lot of others, it doesn't. I'm a big fan of the 1924 masterpiece and an equally big fan of the 1931 remake Mad Love. Both of those movies are classics. They tell the same story in such an engaging way. This is a respectable and interesting try, but it falls short in a number of different areas. 

Jeff Fahey is a criminal psychologist named Bill. Bill loses his arm in a horrible accident. He undergoes some revolutionary surgery and he has a new arm grafted on to replace the one he lost. It just so happens that the arm he receives belongs to a psychotic killer. Bill starts to notice that his arm seems to have a life of it's own and it's ruining his own. He comes in contact with others that have gotten limb replacements and finds that they are all suffering just like he is. Just differently. Add some weird doctors and a very thin plot line and you have got Body Parts.

Firstly, this film has a really good cast. Jeff Fahey (Lapidus, the pilot from Lost), Horror icon Brad Dourif, Kim Delaney, Zakes Mokae, Lindsay Duncan, and Paul Ben-Victor all round out your top actors. Dourif and Fahey do an amazing job pulling their characters to life. Secondly, the cinematography and lighting are stupendous. Parts of this movie felt like a throwback and nod to Grindhouse classics. It was a nice little treat. Third, it is pretty generous with the gore. Certain scenes were campy and over-the-top but that only added to the creepiness of the picture as a whole. It wasn't a terrible movie. It just had a sizable amount of flaws. 


Those flaws are mostly with the story. It has tons of holes. The movie does a good job of throwing swerves in the way, but ends up not answering most of the questions it generates. The biggest flaws are with the motivations of the antagonists. It leaves me scratching my head and feels a bit thrown together. Like the director had wanted to go one way but financial restrictions made him go the other. I don't understand how that would happen when you have a $10,000,000 budget. 

This is an interesting early nineties horror movie that delivers suspense and thrills. The medical scenes and general attack scenes are pretty gory and that only adds to the picture. It has a certain cult feel and I like that. It also has some good touches of Noir. I mentioned the lighting earlier and noticed that the shadows are very Noir-ish. This is a great movie for those that are following up on any of those actors careers. It might come off as a little boring to a casual horror fan. 

Director: Eric Red
Country: Canada
Style: Body Horror

Did ya know...
Body Parts is very similar to a 1971 episode of Night Gallery titled "The Hand of Borgus Weems." Body Parts was theatrically released August 2, 1991. It was first released on home video February 20, 1992 and later on DVD September 14, 2004. Paramount pulled ads for Body Parts in Milwaukee, Wisconsin after police found dismembered bodies in Jeffrey Dahmer's apartment.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy. Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural t...

Le Diable au Convent (1899) - George Melies

Le Diable au Convent is longer than the two previous Georges Méliès ventures into short form horror. This particular French short shows the Devil himself running a convent and terrorizing the poor old nuns that live there. However he is finally vanquished by the good of Faith. This is yet another Méliès classic, showcasing the art work that really goes into his short film-making. This is one of the earliest examples of a horror movie that could rely on its elaborate set design and artistic design. Everything in this film, although horribly aged, has been packaged extremely well. If you are a fan of production and set design then I would highly recommend just about anything that Melies has his name on. Though nothing that is considered too extreme actually happens, Satan does have his way with a convent. The satanic imagery itself must have kept this film on the traveling carnival circuit. It certainly wouldn’t fit into the good moral bag that society shoved i...

Spookies (1986) - Genie Joseph, Thomas Doran, and Brendan Faulkner

It's impossible to get a decent movie when you take two films and just squash them together. That is essentially the story of how this movie came together. The film started as Twisted Souls. However, according to the financial backer they didn't have enough horror. So they ended up hiring another guy to come in and add a monster in virtually every scene.  This movie started out being directed by Brendan Faulkner and Thomas Doran. It basically is the tale of two sets of teenagers that arrive to a strange building surrounded by a strange cemetery. It was your usual tale of teenagers in a big hows with a few monsters. Then they brought in Genie Joseph and added even more. Like a haunted birthday party, a murderous cat-man, zombies, and an old wizard. It really became a smorgasbord of horror with a very thin plot-line leading it around. This movie is hard to summarize in a conventional way. It just packs so much.  The most interesting part of this movie are ...