Skip to main content

The Testament of Dr. Mabuse (1933) - Fritz Lang


The first thing that I noticed about Das Testament des Dr. Mabuse is that the cinematography is absolutely wunderbar. The story is immediately engaging and the acting is superb. This is my first viewing and I am incredibly happy with the movie being part of the Criterion Collection. The picture and sound are of the highest quality. I know my set up isn't exactly the silver screen but it looked fantastic. It almost looked as if Fritz Lang went into the future and shot the movie in the fifties. Everything is so crisp and clean. What a picture. 

It tells the story of Dr. Mabuse, who is incarcerated at a local insane asylum. While in the asylum he writes out thousands of pages of crime details. These details start to come true and our "hero" Inspector Lohmann begins to investigate, this takes him to some very dangerous individuals. The movie has crazy visions and ghosts. It is really scary during some parts and engaging during the others, to me it balances pretty well. It's a crime movie with supernatural elements to it. The suspense is perfect. Just the right amount. It is pretty lengthy but it doesn't drag. 

Everything about this movie is fantastic. Every character is so well written and rounded out. They each seem like a real person. Lang's previous film M had the same feel. These films feel like they are far superior to the drivel that is spilling out everywhere else. He never even lets go of his expressionist ways while paying equal attention to the sound in the movie. I say that with great admiration. I feel like this movie could be a sleeper hit at the box office today. I am not saying that this movie should be remade. It's far too perfect. It was a victim of timing though. It just had to come out when Hitler was in power and Joseph Goebbels squashed it. The film was banned in Germany. They thought that it would inspire anti-government protests. However, it was in wide release in Europe and did fairly well.

I highly recommend this movie to film buff's everywhere. Get your hands on a copy of this and hold on to it. It's a damn fine picture and Fritz Lang's best horror feature. Otto Wernicke does a great job as the inspector and Karl Meixner as the Detective. Watching them put the case together is really entertaining and interesting. They turn in some great performances. The movie has some amazing scenes that are just huge and tremendous. This was definitely the definition of a blockbuster for its day. I will say it again, what a picture. Go find it or watch the Spanish version below. It's not the same. I found it at Netflix.
  • Banned in Germany, the world premiere was held on April 21, 1933 in Budapest in its full original 124 minute version.
  • The film was not shown to the German public until August 24, 1951 when it was presented in an edited 111 minute version. 
  • Banned by Josef Goebbels, in 1933, for its subversive nature and the possibility that it might "incite people to anti-social behavior and terrorism against the State". 
Sorry it's in Spanish, it's all YouTube had

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy. Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural t

Spookies (1986) - Genie Joseph, Thomas Doran, and Brendan Faulkner

It's impossible to get a decent movie when you take two films and just squash them together. That is essentially the story of how this movie came together. The film started as Twisted Souls. However, according to the financial backer they didn't have enough horror. So they ended up hiring another guy to come in and add a monster in virtually every scene.  This movie started out being directed by Brendan Faulkner and Thomas Doran. It basically is the tale of two sets of teenagers that arrive to a strange building surrounded by a strange cemetery. It was your usual tale of teenagers in a big hows with a few monsters. Then they brought in Genie Joseph and added even more. Like a haunted birthday party, a murderous cat-man, zombies, and an old wizard. It really became a smorgasbord of horror with a very thin plot-line leading it around. This movie is hard to summarize in a conventional way. It just packs so much.  The most interesting part of this movie are defini

Le Diable au Convent (1899) - George Melies

Le Diable au Convent is longer than the two previous Georges Méliès ventures into short form horror. This particular French short shows the Devil himself running a convent and terrorizing the poor old nuns that live there. However he is finally vanquished by the good of Faith. This is yet another Méliès classic, showcasing the art work that really goes into his short film-making. This is one of the earliest examples of a horror movie that could rely on its elaborate set design and artistic design. Everything in this film, although horribly aged, has been packaged extremely well. If you are a fan of production and set design then I would highly recommend just about anything that Melies has his name on. Though nothing that is considered too extreme actually happens, Satan does have his way with a convent. The satanic imagery itself must have kept this film on the traveling carnival circuit. It certainly wouldn’t fit into the good moral bag that society shoved itself into back in