Skip to main content

Prince of Darkness (1987) - John Carpenter

Prince of Darkness is boring. Not the, turn it off and do something else boring. But the, maybe if I lean close enough and stop talking it might get better, kind of boring. This all star cast that had mostly worked with Carpenter before, did about as good as they could have. It wasn't like John Carpenter was choosing out of the A-List category here. I mean we get a good variety. Donald Pleasence, he worked with Carpenter on Halloween. Dennis Dun and Victor Wong both worked with him on Big Trouble in Little China. He chooses from the people he knows. In the future he will even pull new actors from this movie into his other productions. Susan Blanchard goes on to work in They Live. I am sorry for rambling... my point is this. When you are choosing from such a small community you really limit what you have to work with. Sometimes you are blessed with awesome actors, other times you have to make do with what you have. I think John Carpenter has that problem. He has to make do with what he has.
That being said. Prince of Darkness is a pretty decent movie, for being a Carpenter flick. It still holds that gritty grimy grind-house style that he likes to use. I think that is why it seems so out of place. I don't know. It feels like John Carpenter was trying to be Steven Spielberg. He wanted to make every movie feel like a Goonies type adventure. This just had that vibe. The movie does have some really creepy scenes and captures, pretty well, some decently creepy "found footage" stuff.
The movie is about a group of college students, a professor, and a priest that stay overnight in a creepy church in Los Angeles. In the basement of the church there is a weird cylinder that has a weird creepy green liquid in it, that liquid is either the Anti-Christ or a demon. Something evil. The liquid is sentient and begins to possess the students. Meanwhile, everyone is having weird dreams that actually turn out to be neurally-transmitted messages from the future. The dreams/messages are warning the students. They show something creepy and evil hovering in a church doorway. Its weird. The green liquids motive is to possess a body and have that body pull the Devil himself from a mirror.

The storyline is hard to grasp at times, it doesn't help that most of the film is inaudible. Donald Pleasance and Victor Wong speak in mumbles and half-tones. It's a wonder I figured anything about the movie out. This film still feels a lot like Big Trouble in Little China, released the year before. There are really campy moments that completely make this movie an icon of its era. There are others that make me sit back and scratch my head. However, this is a pretty decent eighties movie and a great installment to the 31 movies of Halloween.

 Director: John Carpenter
Country: USA
Style: Demonic Adventure Horror

 Did ya know...
Donald Pleasence plays Father Loomis, a reference to his character in Halloween. This is the second film in John Carpenter's Apocalypse Trilogy. The first being The Thing and the third being In the Mouth of Madness. This was the first movie that Carpenter had done independently since Escape from New York. 



Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
I find this movie very good and I watched it several times.
I am sorry you did not like it. :(
June 13, 2013 at 7:04 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy. Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural t...
Post a Comment
Not scared yet? »

Sleepy Hollow (1999) - Tim Burton

Tim Burton's take on the old Sleepy Hollow tale is really interesting. He adds his own flair of course. He delves very deeply into the original story by Washington Irving. The casting is usual for Burton. Johnny Depp of course in your lead. Helena Bonham Carter, thrown in for some flavor. The score is done by Danny Elfman. It's literally just the Ichabod Crane story run through the Tim Burton machine. But in a good way. Sleepy Hollow has a problem with a guy, running around, taking people's heads. Like, a lot of people. The town sends word for assistance and the nervous  Constable Ichabod Crane reports. He starts to unravel clues that take him down an incredibly strange path. With the Horseman still murdering patrons, Crane tries finding who's next before they lose their head.  I've always been a big fan of the Disney cartoon,  The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad . This movie is a far cry from Bing Crosby and quaint animations....
Post a Comment
Not scared yet? »

Le Manoir du Diable (1896) - George Melies

According to Wikipedia in August of 2011, Le Manoir du diable by Georges Melies is the first horror movie. Well, actually its a short film (about three minuets or so) but film was really hard to come by in that time so this counts as a film to me. The plot of the film is basic, you have your hero being tormented by demonic things in a crazy castle room... However, that plot isn't what brought the crowds. The thing that drove the popularity of these films was the fact that you were seeing motion on screen. I suggest going and seeing Hugo. That film is spectacular. It answered so many questions that I had. It really sets the scene and the tone. The film has strong christian overtones and actually ends with Christianity prevailing over the "tides of darkness". I provided a link at the bottom of this review for anyone that would like to see this pioneer in Horror Film. The movie uses very, very early "movie magic" that is an abundance of smoke and m...
Post a Comment
Not scared yet? »