Skip to main content

Return of the Living Dead: Part 2 (1987) - Ken Weiderhorn



Return of the Living Dead Part 2, much like the original, does little to frighten you and more to make your roll your eyes. This parody of 80's Z Movies is so full of slapstick comedy and corny over-the-top acting that you can hardly take this movie seriously at all. Perhaps that is the point. The movie does little to add to the Z mythos that is floating around Hollywood. Instead, it lifts most of the plot points from the previous film. It looks like a higher budget and more thought out version of the original movie. It even brings back two actors from the first movie that sort of reprise their roles in this one.

This movie follows the young Jesse Wilson, a young kid that lives in a newly developed housing project. While grab-assing with the local hooligans he finds a familiar looking barrel that is shrouded in mystery. While left in the protection of the local hooligans, the barrel is opened and zombie gas seeps out. Now Jesse, his sister, the cable-repair boy, and some holdovers from the first movie have to survive and find their way out of the city that is in quarantine!

Doesn't that sound a little familiar? I can't really blame the director here, there is only one available main plot for Z movies. The only thing that the director/writers can do are hire new actors and tweak the subplot points. The main story is still going to be the same. Zombies are attacking en masse (is that right?) and a few people have to survive; two of those people trying to survive already died in the last movie, and they even reference the fact that they are back in this movie, relating to their previous encounter with Zombies as nothing but a dream.


This movie is corny and un-creative but overall qualifies to be a quite an amazing b-movie of the era. Is this movie better than its original? No. However, it is on a different plane. This movie is as watchable as any dark comedy from the 80's and should be celebrated as such. I can watch this movie back to back with a classic like Better Off Dead.

This movie is full of gore including creative deaths and floods of blood. It actually surprised me a bit to see the gore. They really saved the money gained from the first movie and put it into the effects for this one. I guess that is a plus. I suggest watching this movie if you are a fan of 80's horror. This movie is incredibly nostalgic. Even the soundtrack takes you back.


Director: Ken Weiderhorn
Country: USA

Did ya know...
There is a Michael Jackson zombie in Thriller gear that pops up. Thom Matthews and James Karen both, nearly, reprise their roles from the first movie. Even going as far as to repeat a few of their lines. The director wanted to get out of the horror business and purposefully made this movie in a more comedic way to try to gain more comedic scripts. He still, almost exclusively, receives horror scripts.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy. Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural t

Spookies (1986) - Genie Joseph, Thomas Doran, and Brendan Faulkner

It's impossible to get a decent movie when you take two films and just squash them together. That is essentially the story of how this movie came together. The film started as Twisted Souls. However, according to the financial backer they didn't have enough horror. So they ended up hiring another guy to come in and add a monster in virtually every scene.  This movie started out being directed by Brendan Faulkner and Thomas Doran. It basically is the tale of two sets of teenagers that arrive to a strange building surrounded by a strange cemetery. It was your usual tale of teenagers in a big hows with a few monsters. Then they brought in Genie Joseph and added even more. Like a haunted birthday party, a murderous cat-man, zombies, and an old wizard. It really became a smorgasbord of horror with a very thin plot-line leading it around. This movie is hard to summarize in a conventional way. It just packs so much.  The most interesting part of this movie are defini

Le Diable au Convent (1899) - George Melies

Le Diable au Convent is longer than the two previous Georges Méliès ventures into short form horror. This particular French short shows the Devil himself running a convent and terrorizing the poor old nuns that live there. However he is finally vanquished by the good of Faith. This is yet another Méliès classic, showcasing the art work that really goes into his short film-making. This is one of the earliest examples of a horror movie that could rely on its elaborate set design and artistic design. Everything in this film, although horribly aged, has been packaged extremely well. If you are a fan of production and set design then I would highly recommend just about anything that Melies has his name on. Though nothing that is considered too extreme actually happens, Satan does have his way with a convent. The satanic imagery itself must have kept this film on the traveling carnival circuit. It certainly wouldn’t fit into the good moral bag that society shoved itself into back in