Skip to main content

The Amityville Horror (1979) - Stuart Rosenberg

October 23rd, 2010
If it is possible this movie is terrifying and boring all at the same time. There are some choice scenes in this movie that really take the cake, they are really scary, and then there are scenes in this movie that are really dull and bland. The movie has this formula of long, drawn out scenes broken up with something creepy or scary. The movie doesn't get repetitive, which is a good thing, its just that some of the scenes that have to do with James Brolin are boring, until the end where the movie picks up again. 


If you didn't know, this movie is supposedly based on a true story about a family that moved into a house where a mass murder occurred the year prior. Soon after the family moves in they realize that the house itself is evil and is trying to drive everyone insane. The scariest element in the movie has to be the sound, with the first scare being a booming voice screeching GET OUT! From there you get other big uses of long silent scenes broken up with a really loud, sudden noise. This seems to be their main method for manufacturing scares and it gets pretty stagnant pretty fast. 

The movie starts out really promising with action and suspense from the beginning, but from there it just starts to become this weird drama where little is developed or discussed. I will spoil a bit of the movie if you haven't it so beware. It's really hard to figure out if George Lutz can understand he is acting like an ass the entire time or even if he comprehends something creepy is happening. You see bursts of recognition sweep across his face, but then he is right back to being a dick to his family. There is an entire portion of the movie where Lutz knocks out a wall in his basement to reveal a ghostly figure, and then the family just stays the night! WHAT? Why doesn't Kathy Lutz just take her kids and leave? She has to stand by her man? I don't get it. 

The movie is a staple in the horror movie community, and I think it holds this spot because of the "true story" angle. The movie could have done so much more and it could have been the creepiest movie ever, unfortunately the movie is sticks to the book and it doesn't even attempt to venture outside of that realm.

The acting in the movie is pretty decent. Margot Kidder and James Brolin are really good in their roles as newlyweds; the movie also stars Rod Steiger and Don Stroud.


Oh, mother of God, I'm coming apart!

S!D

  • Both stars of the movie James Brolin and Margot Kidder say they don't believe the Amityville story.  
  • Originally made as a TV movie.
  • James Brolin claims he couldn't get work for two years because his character was so cruel in the movie.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy. Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural t...
Post a Comment
Not scared yet? »

Le Diable au Convent (1899) - George Melies

Le Diable au Convent is longer than the two previous Georges Méliès ventures into short form horror. This particular French short shows the Devil himself running a convent and terrorizing the poor old nuns that live there. However he is finally vanquished by the good of Faith. This is yet another Méliès classic, showcasing the art work that really goes into his short film-making. This is one of the earliest examples of a horror movie that could rely on its elaborate set design and artistic design. Everything in this film, although horribly aged, has been packaged extremely well. If you are a fan of production and set design then I would highly recommend just about anything that Melies has his name on. Though nothing that is considered too extreme actually happens, Satan does have his way with a convent. The satanic imagery itself must have kept this film on the traveling carnival circuit. It certainly wouldn’t fit into the good moral bag that society shoved i...
1 comment
Not scared yet? »

Spookies (1986) - Genie Joseph, Thomas Doran, and Brendan Faulkner

It's impossible to get a decent movie when you take two films and just squash them together. That is essentially the story of how this movie came together. The film started as Twisted Souls. However, according to the financial backer they didn't have enough horror. So they ended up hiring another guy to come in and add a monster in virtually every scene.  This movie started out being directed by Brendan Faulkner and Thomas Doran. It basically is the tale of two sets of teenagers that arrive to a strange building surrounded by a strange cemetery. It was your usual tale of teenagers in a big hows with a few monsters. Then they brought in Genie Joseph and added even more. Like a haunted birthday party, a murderous cat-man, zombies, and an old wizard. It really became a smorgasbord of horror with a very thin plot-line leading it around. This movie is hard to summarize in a conventional way. It just packs so much.  The most interesting part of this movie are ...
2 comments
Not scared yet? »