Skip to main content

Son of Frankenstein (1939) - Rowland V. Lee

Son of Frankenstein is the inevitable return of one of the icons of horror. I couldn't tell you if anyone was seriously waiting for this one. They have filled the thing with heavyweight horror actors like Bela Lugosi, Basil Rathbone, Lionel Atwill, Dwight Frye and of course; Boris Karloff. This movie is so heavy on the acting side that it begins to collapse in on itself and actually takes away from other aspects of the film. It feels off...

This could have possibly been the greatest Frankenstein movie of all time; however, the plot does away with everything that the Monster learned in the previous film and pisses away all of the  character and story development that came with the original Bride of Frankenstein. The iconic look of the Monster is also severely tampered with; instead of wearing his usual dark suit as in the previous Frankenstein films he dons a fur vest and tall black boots. What? A fur vest? Who the hell does he think he is? 

The movie is about Dr. Frankenstein's son, Wolf Von Frankenstein, coming to receive his inheritance. That being his fathers estate and laboratory in the terrorized village of movies prior. It looks like Wolf Von Frankenstein is going to turn over a new leaf and clear his family's name in the village, however something clicks in his brain about 20 minuets into the movie and he decides to try and re-animate his fathers ravenous creation. Referred to earlier in the film as Wolf's half brother.

The movie has some incredible sets and the art direction is spectacular, you can really see the German Expressionist influences, and while the rest of the film is very well shot it lacks in certain areas. As I said before the character development hit a reset button with this movie and in doing so sort of lost the pace and momentum that the last two movies had built. And what makes a movie entertaining without an interesting monster and well developed characters?

The roles in the film are really kind of strange: Lionel Atwill gives a great performance as Inspector Krogh, Boris Karloff contributes a pretty mediocre one in his last portrayal of the Monster, Basil Rathbone is horrible, just horrible, and then there is Bela Lugosi who steals the show as Ygor. Ygor, the Monster's only "friend, was was hung but he somehow survived and goes through the entire movie with a wooden neck? This movie is hardly scary and I think serves as a weak follow-up to what many consider to be one of the greatest movies of all time.

It does its own thing. It could have been done a lot better or it could have just been left alone. If you want to judge for yourself go ahead and watch the Original, then Bride of Frankenstein, and then this movie. That should put everything in perspective.

Who is going to throw paint on the Monsters vest?

  • This is the first Frankenstein movie not directed by James Whale
  • Much of the film was written just before the scenes were shot
  • This is the final appearance of Karloff as the monster

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Human Monster (1939) - Walter Summers

Bela Lugosi turns in a fantastic performance. It is right on par with the exact same films that had made him famous like Dracula . My personal favorite being The Black Cat . Like the latter, this film suffered from poor circulation and lack of advertisement. Either that or the public wasn't interested in seeing Lugosi in anything else other than his famous bloodsucker. This film has a broad and well acted plot that was rich with detail.  Lugosi has two sides in this picture. His well loved and compassionate side. The other is a strict, brutal lone shark that acts as a sinister villain to blind and handicapped people. He really brutalizes his victims. It's a macabre message to pay your bills.  The film is slow moving and plagued by the usual setbacks from its time. Most of the nation wasn't really that concerned with horror at the time. But studios knew that they would always have an audience. This film is a prime example of that. It's sad because it's 

Ju-On (2000) - Takashi Shimizu

Watching Japanese horror is similar to watching British comedy. If you enjoy dry whit then you probably enjoy the boys of Monty Python in drag. That's the joke, they're dressed like women. Get it? Well, that's British humor. But if you're like most Americans you probably prefer Adam Sandler farting his way across a football field and hooking up with chicks that are way out of his league. Americans usually prefer this more in your face, crass brand of humor. My point is funny in England is different from funny in the US. The same goes for J-Horror. What the Japanese consider scary is very different from what Americans consider scary and it shows in this horror film. Japanese horror is generally slow (a little too slow sometimes), suspenseful and creepy. Ju-On is a creepy effing film. The movie has almost no soundtrack. It is incredibly suspenseful and the pay-offs are pretty awesome, but I think that it was done better in the American version (cultural t

Inseminoid (1981) - Norman J. Warren

What can be said for mindless schlock pictures like this one. They were pumped out in droves during the eighties. Inseminoid !? give me a break! It sounds like some pre-pubescent teenage boys came up with the title. On the plus side the movie isn't horrible to look at and it has a decent amount of gore. If you can separate yourself from the political incorrectness, then you might have a perfectly decent Sci-Fi Monster Feature.  A research team exploring caves on Jupiter accidentally awakens an ancient alien that rapes and impregnates one of the team members. She suffers from terrible shock and trauma, leading to a complete mental breakdown as her pregnancy accelerates faster and faster. Feeling threatened she decides to kill anyone she deems a threat. Can the rest of the research team survive or will they all become victims of INSEMINOID! Apparently this movie had a million dollar budget. That's really shocking considering the outcome of the picture. The acting